There's an old Calvin and Hobbes cartoon where Hobbes asks Calvin if he believes in God. Calvin responds "Well, if there isn't,
someone is out to get me!"
Apparently, this self-named "
logicnazi" does not agree with Calvin's statement.
"...it isn't an acceptable move to say that you believe in science but you don't think it is the whole story. This just redefines the notion of science in question to complete triviality."
No, it doesn't. Basically, your argument is that there can't be a force that disrupts normal scientific progression of events, because that would allow any wacko out there to claim whatever they want about magic, palm reading & speaking with the dead and get away with it logically. This cannot be true, as some people are obviously just saying whatever. Therefore, either some (but not all) of the religious nuts are telling the truth, or all of them are wrong.
I doubt that the latter is correct.
I know that science works. I don't think we understand a lot of it (evolution, for example), but I know its true. However, I do believe that there are some supernatural factors that can (and sometimes do) override the way the universe normally works. Supernatural events are not scientific. They cannot be scientific, simply because they don't fit within the realm of science. However, this does not mean that they are false or that they don't exist.
Take your example, Jesus rising from the dead.
"...I'm saying that if you hold that we have good reason to believe jesus [sic] rose from the dead despite the generally observed medical fact that people don't get up after they are dead you should be upfront with your position that the scientific evidence isn't always the best guide to the truth."
Jesus rising from the dead is unscientific. It was a supernatural event. In essence, it is a physical manifestation of an element of the spiritual realm. Not a ghost, but the power of God to heal, save and deliver.
Science occurs all the time. Supernatural events, by the very definition of the word, do not occur 24/7 in the natural progression of things. Nor do they reduce science to triviality, unless "science" means being able to explain every single physical phenomena. They
always come from, or lead to, spiritual happenings. Unless God or another spiritual force performs directly or works though a person to create the event, it won't happen. These events don't just pop up on every street corner and they almost never change the basic rules of science. However, since God set science in motion, it's perfectly reasonable that He should be able to disrupt it occasionally.
Now, you have two options. You can dismiss the whole idea of a "spiritual realm" as bogus and try to explain everything with science, or you can try to figure out which group of religious "nuts" are telling the truth.
Your choice.